California legislators: rights of athletes are violated by anti-doping agencies

Legislators of California affirm that anti-doping agencies violate fundamental constitutional rights of sportspersons suspected of doping. Thus, athletes that have never tested positive for any prohibited drugs become targets of investigations. That’s why the lawmakers presented a request to Congress to review this issue.
It is known that the USADA is sponsored chiefly by taxpayers. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) gives 10 million dollars each year. This governmental office promotes fighting against application of prohibited medications. Its goal is to uproot illicit manufacture and drug use, crimes resulted from usage of illegal substances, etc.
The request of California legislators was initiated soon after the 7-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong decided not to appeal his lifetime suspension from professional sports.
Everyone knows that the former cyclist Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his 7 titles obtained at Tour de France. He was also banned from competitions entirely.
Summer Lance Armstrong filed a lawsuit against the USADA, affirming that his constitutional rights were violated. But the judge Sam Sparks refused to accept the lawsuit. He confirmed that the USADA acted correctly. Sam Sparks also noted that the USADA was formed in order to clean sports from those that administer forbidden substances.
California Senator Michael Rubio claimed that Sam Sparks didn’t do correctly, refusing to accept the lawsuit against the USADA. Thus, the senators affirmed that the USADA violated rights of certain sportspersons. That’s why they asked the Congress to review the issue.

Barry Bonds is ready to support athletes suspected of doping

Barry Bonds knows what an athlete experiences, when he/she is pursued by the government and anti-doping agencies. He understands what this individual feels. That’s why the former professional baseball player can sympathize and support sportspeople accused of doping. So, Barry Bonds supports the former American cyclist Lance Armstrong.
During an interview a journalist asked Barry Bonds about problems of Lance Armstrong connected with doping suspicions. The former baseball player expressed his admiration towards the cyclist. He claimed that Lance Armstrong was the most brilliant cyclist that has ever been in the sport of cycling.
Undoubtedly, Barry Bonds knows what he says. He realizes what it means to be a good cyclist. After he retired from baseball, he became a cyclist. He took part in some competitions successfully. Being a cyclist, he sees that this sport has the same problems like baseball. He sees that cyclists are pursued by federal prosecutors and anti-doping officials like professional baseball players.
Both Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds were accused of doping. They were investigated by the government and anti-doping officers.
Federal prosecutors accused Barry Bonds of lying about usage of prohibited substances and obstruction of justice. They couldn’t prove that the sportsperson lied about administration of banned medicines. But they claimed that he was guilty of obstructing justice. The former baseball player decided to appeal the decision of the court.
When it comes to Lance Armstrong, the government dropped the case against him. But the USADA continued to prosecute the cyclist. The USADA confirmed that Lance Armstrong had been using banned products throughout his cycling career. The cyclist decided to discontinue fighting against accusations of the anti-doping agency. He lost his Tour de France titles and money he had won at these events.
Although Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his titles, Americans continue to respect him. They claim that he is the most wonderful cyclist of all times. Lance Armstrong’s sponsors continue to support his cancer charity. The seven-time Tour de France winner helps people to fight against cancer. So, many persons are thankful. They will always remember what Lance Armstrong has done for them.
Barry Bonds’ reputation has been destructed by accusations related to application of forbidden substances. The former baseball player hopes that his achievements during the baseball career are more significant than the suspicions. He believes that people will forget about the suspicions and he will be considered to be a baseball star.

Nadezya Ostapchuk’s coach is guilty of her positive for steroid

Nadezya Ostapchuk, a Belarusian shot putter, received the gold medal at the 2012 Olympic Games. But she failed a drug test. As a result, she lost the medal that was given to Valeria Adams of New Zealand.
Two tests displayed that a steroid’s metabolites presented in her urine samples.
If a sportsperson is caught taking any forbidden medications, he/she is commonly sentenced to a ban of two years. As for Nadezya Ostapchuk, she received one-year ban. Why was the sentence lighter? There were some circumstances that proved the following condition: Nadezya Ostapchuk didn’t administer any banned medicine knowingly.
At the beginning Nadezya Ostapchuk blamed his former coach. She said that he had sabotaged her sample.
The Belarusian National Anti-Doping Agency investigated this case. The International Association of Athletic Federation also participated in the investigation. It was found out that Yefimov was guilty. This person added powder of methenolone into food of Nadezya Ostapchuk during the last week before the Olympics. The coach reported that he had worried about the shot putter. He believed that this steroid would help to win.
Actually, it is difficult to determine why Yefimov has done it. He only caused the trouble.
Anti-doping agencies accepted these arguments. That’s why the Belarusian shot putter received only one-year suspension.
As for supporters of Valeria Adams, they didn’t believe that Nadezya Ostapchuk had not applied the steroid intentionally. They said that Yefimov just tried to protect the shot putter. They confirmed that Nadezya Ostapchuk had taken steroids under recommendations of her coach.
If Nadezya Ostapchuk’s performance was great several months before the 2012 London Olympics, her trainer had to be sure that she would win. Why did he worry about her performance?

Why does government try to learn about testicles and erections of some athletes?

Certain sportspersons who are accused of steroid use become targets of the government. Federal prosecutors do almost everything in order to determine whether certain athletes have administered any performance-enhancing drugs. They don’t spare taxpayers’ funds for this purpose. Much money is spent to disclose even private life of sportspersons. According to the government, some details of their private behavior can disclose the truth about usage of banned medications. So, girlfriends of several sportspersons are interviewed by feds.
For example, it has been revealed that former girlfriends of Lance Armstrong and Roger Clemens and a former mistress of Barry Bonds have been asked about several details linked with private life of these sportspersons. Which questions were asked?
Kimberly Bell, a former mistress of Barry Bonds, was asked about size of testicles of this baseball player. She affirmed that the baseball player’s testicles were shrunken. So, her answer served as an argument that Barry Bonds used steroids and/or other prohibited products.
It is known that shrinkage of testicles is included in undesirable results of some steroids. So, the government decided to find out whether Barry Bonds had had this trouble. But it is a poor argument in order to prove that anyone has taken certain banned medicines. Steroid users may prevent this adverse effect, if they apply some medicines for this purpose.
Mindy McCready, a former mistress of Roger Clemens, was asked whether this former baseball player had suffered from erectile dysfunctions. The singer claimed that sometimes Roger Clemens had suffered from this problem.
As for erectile dysfunctions, they may occur during usage of steroids. But if you study information about unwanted effects of steroids more attentively, you can comprehend that this problem is more likely to appear after discontinuation of administration. It happens because natural production of testosterone is normally suppressed by usage of exogenous testosterone. But since there are such medications which are capable to restore natural testosterone production, erectile dysfunctions can be avoided.
Sheryl Crow, a former girlfriend of Lance Armstrong, was also interviewed by federal prosecutors. But questions have not been made public. According to several suppositions, she might have been asked also about sexual abilities of the cyclist.
In fact, federal prosecutors have a wrong opinion in this case. Although shrinkage of testicles and erectile dysfunctions may occur because of steroids, these arguments are not proper.

Don Hooton: steroids can lead to certain serious health problems

Some remedies are named “performance-enhancing drugs”. What do these medications represent? Why have been they named “performance-enhancing”? Various persons may present different definitions. Let see what a teenager says! Before presenting her opinion it is necessary to mention that her brother, Taylor Hooton, experienced serious depression after application of steroids. Finally, he committed suicide. He desired to look like Melky Cabrera, Barry Bonds and other famous athletes that have used steroids. But his death came suddenly. His sister believes that performance-enhancing drugs are dangerous preparations. They are named “performance-enhancing drugs” in order to lure young people that desire to improve their appearances and performances.
Don Hooton, Taylor’s father, established a foundation to educated youth about dangers related to steroids. He describes which risks are associated with administration of anabolic steroids and other related preparations. He also uses slideshow presentations in order to explain that these medications may lead to such negative effects, as diabetes, heart diseases, liver disorders, etc.
Don Hooton tries to educate young individuals about grave risks linked with usage of steroids. But he admits that it is difficult. He claims that a lot of young persons use doping products. When their friends see that they become stronger and more muscular, they desire to be like them. They follow their examples in order to change appearance and have more strength.
Unfortunately, certain parents think that their children are free from steroid use. Some of them believe that their daughters don’t take steroids because these drugs are recommended to get muscles and body weight in general. But according to numerous sources, girls also administer steroids. They use these medicines in order to lose fat. Several parents don’t know that anabolic steroids are also applied to reduce fat deposits. That’s why grown-ups also should be taught about effects of steroids. Furthermore, some parents think that their children don’t administer steroids because these products are expensive. But it is enough to have 20-500 dollars in order to obtain steroids for a cycle.
It is considered that each16th high school student administers steroids. But this opinion is mistaken. Each 16th high school student admits to taking performance-enhancing drugs.   But the most of young individuals hide that they administer these products.
Those who listen to Don Hooton’s presentations about steroids express their thanks. They are thankful that they may get knowledge about these preparations.

Hypocrites fight against steroid use in sports

Everyone knows that anabolic steroids are frequently blamed. If a sportsperson or a bodybuilder takes steroids and/or other doping products, he/she is called a cheater. Sportswriters report about such sportspersons as about those who have destroyed their reputation. Anti-doping agencies put great efforts and spend money in other to catch athletes that dope. Even the government spends taxpayers’ funds and time in order to prove that some athletes have administered steroids and/or doping products. It is confirmed that those that dope take unfair advantages in sports.
Many pieces of news describe the fight against steroids. But let think whether arguments against administration of steroids are strong enough to prove that it is disgraceful to apply them.
It is affirmed that steroid-using athletes serve as a bad example for kids and young individuals. It is known that youth sees a lot of sports stars that use steroids and other related medicines. As a result, young persons desire to look and be as strong, as these prominent sports figures.  Moreover, it is widely disputed about health dangers related to steroids. But if you are attentive, you can notice that these arguments are weak because they are full of hypocrisy.
Let examine the most frequently used arguments against usage of anabolic steroids and/or other related medications.
According to the first argument, usage of steroids is closely associated with certain potential health dangers. Numerous articles warn about atrophy of testicles and enlarged heart that may occur on account of steroid use. Although it may be true, let analyze our life. We eat unhealthy food, however we know that it destroys our health. Some individuals apply antidepressants that are also very unsafe. We do also other unhealthy things.
According to another argument against steroids, steroid-using athletes have unfair advantages in competitions. They win because they increase performance with these medicines. Let see what happens in other fields, for example, in the world of entertainment.  Many actors and actresses improve their appearances and performances in order to play certain roles in movies. They also have unfair advantages over others with the help of certain surgeries and other things. But they are not suspended from the world of entertainment.
While it is confirmed that steroid-using sportspersons send bad messages to young individuals that desire to look like them and follow their examples, no one mentions about the bad example of actors and actresses. Young girls also want to look like those they see in magazines.
While federal agents pursue sportspeople that take steroids, they have nothing to do with actors and actresses that act the same way.
It is clear that arguments against application of steroids are very weak. They display hypocrisy that reigns in our counterfeit world.

What is metenolone?

Nadzeya Ostapchuk, a Belarusian shot putter, won the 2012 Olympic gold medal. But the female athlete lost the medal because she was caught using the anabolic steroid metenolone (methenolone). She was asked to provide two samples. The substance metenolone presented in both urine samples.
If you read news related to steroid use in sports, you must know that competitive athletes and bodybuilders are usually caught taking other steroids and/or doping products. But when it comes to Nadzeya Ostapchuk, she was caught using metenolone. It is strange, according to affirmations of anti-doping officers. What does this banned drug represent? Why don’t sportspersons usually apply this medication for increase of performance?
Metenolone is an anabolic steroid. It possesses slight androgenic properties. It acts like testosterone, increasing muscle mass and adding energy.
Although this medication possesses just mild androgenic nature, it causes development of sex male characteristics in females. Women that apply this medication may face common signs of masculinization: the voice deepens; excessive hair grows on the face and on other parts of the body; etc.
This medicine can be used orally or injectionally.
Metenolone (Methenolone) produces amazing effects, when it is applied by sportspeople during their workouts. It is not administered during competitions. It doesn’t work, if it is used only on the day of a competition.
It is also stated that it is easy to catch those who use this anabolic steroid.
Negative consequences of Metenolone (Methenolone) hinge upon dosages that are applied. They are following: water retention, hypercalcaemia, bone growth, hirsutism, acne, male-pattern baldness, menstrual irregularities, enhanced sex drive, etc.
Thus, when you see a female athlete that has deep voice and excessive hair growth on the body, you may suspect her of steroid use. In fact, it is wrong because these troubles may occur also in those females who don’t apply any steroids. But sometimes these signs demonstrate that certain women administer medications which have androgenic properties.

Australian doctor prescribed steroids to those that didn’t have therapeutic needs to apply these drugs

Some physician abuse their position, prescribing products that don’t meet criteria of medical needs of patients. Why do they do it? It is known that some preparations are claimed to be prescription medicines. It means that you can’t purchase them legally, if you don’t have any prescription from your treating physician. Anabolic steroids belong to such medications. It is illegal to purchase steroids without a prescription in some countries. Those who do it may be punished. They may be enforced to pay a fine and/or go to prison. Undoubtedly, numerous people are looking for methods to buy and take these preparations without having legal problems.
Anabolic steroids are frequently abused. Numerous sportspersons and bodybuilders take these products not for medical purposes but for performance-enhancing effects. If they live in countries where these preparations can’t be bought legally without prescriptions, they find certain ways to mask their illegal purchase and application. Sportspersons, bodybuilders and even ordinary people ask their physicians to prescribe them these preparations, as if they had medical needs to administer them. Thus, some physicians induce selling anabolic steroids to those that abuse them. Here is a situation.
Peter Grant, an Australian doctor, recommended steroids to 14 persons during nine years. Medical state of these patients didn’t require usage of these preparations. Thus, the doctor was accused of improper practicing medicine. For example, he prescribed to a patient using such drugs, as Halotestin, Sustanon, Andriol Testocaps, Deca Durabolin, Scitropin and Proviron. But there was no any medical basis to prescribe these drugs to this individual. Furthermore, these preparations were recommended him during 9 years.
The health care provider Peter Grant acknowledged that several patients were competing. So, he prescribed them steroids. He also admitted to studying scientific literature about anabolic steroids. He affirmed that he knew how steroids acted. Thus, he supervised the patients who used anabolic steroids.
Taking these aspects in consideration, it is possible to claim that the doctor Peter Grant was better known by those that took steroids for increase of performance than by those who had to be treated from some diseases. Peter Grant claimed that he knew that steroids were purchased by his patients only for personal use.
When the doctor appeared in the court, the judge confirmed that the doctor promoted selling steroids. The judge added that Peter Grant had to be punished properly. Peter Grant was suspended from practicing medicine for 12 months. Furthermore, the judge confirmed that he would be disciplined during the next 2 years.

Sheryl Crow was scheduled to be questioned in court

Lance Armstrong was accused of doping. It was suspected that the sportsperson had used EPO and other forbidden medicines.
A lot of individuals provided their testimonies in the court during the investigation connected with Lance Armstrong’s case. A former girlfriend of the cyclist was also targeted. She was scheduled to appear in the court. Certain sports writers noticed that the musician Sheryl Crow had been interviewed by feds.
Lance Armstrong and Sheryl Crow were claimed to be one of the most celebrated couples. They spent much time together. Sheryl Crow lived with the seven-time winner of Tour de France in Spain. The musician travelled with Lance Armstrong during his trainings. They were engaged, when Lance Armstrong won Tour de France the 7th time.
Lance Armstrong’s former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton noted that Lance Armstrong had taken forbidden products. They also stated that the athlete had been the leader of a doping team. In addition to these affirmations, Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton claimed that Armstrong’s apartment had been full of equipment utilized for administration of forbidden medicines. These individuals were going to testify against the 7-time winner of tour de France. They confirmed that the cyclist had won Tour de France 7 times with the help of performance-enhancing drugs.
When it comes to the musician Sheryl Crow, she didn’t appear in the court because the case against the athlete was dropped before the hearing.
While federal prosecutors dropped the case, the USADA continued to pursue the former cyclist. As a result, Lance Armstrong lost his titles. He was also sentenced to life-time suspension. Fortunately, his charity against cancer was not affected at all. Sponsors continue to support him and donate. Although his titles are lost, Lance Armstrong is appreciated because he helps many people in their efforts against cancer.

ESPN2 journalist: Derek Jeter administers prohibited preparations

The sports journalist Skip Bayless accuses the baseball player Derek Jeter of steroid use. He has pronounced his thoughts of criticism during the talk show “First take”.
Actually, Skip Bayless doesn’t have any evidence in order to suggest that Derek Jeter takes prohibited medicines. Despites this fact, the statements of the journalist have been spread. Before accusing Derek Jeter of doping, the sports journalist began to criticize anti-doping system of the MLB. He claimed that the MLB’s tests for performance-enhancing drugs are not good enough to detect those that take forbidden products.
The journalist Skip Bayless reminded Victor Conte’s point of view linked with testosterone:epitestosterone ratio test that is used in the MLB. This method is not sophisticated enough to catch those that use banned drugs. Instead of this method, it is necessary to utilize another. Carbon isotope ratio is more suitable.
The journalist Skip Bayless also stated that the MLB didn’t have any testing for HGH. The test for this product is performed in the MLB only once per year. But blood tests for this medicine should be performed more times during year. Otherwise, players may take this product and remain undetectable.
So, the journalist suggests that Derek Jeter applies HGH and banned products. The ESPN2 journalist also claims that if he were a baseball player, he would use HGH.
So, the ESPN2 journalist suggests that MLB players apply HGH and probably other forbidden medicines without being detected by anti-doping officers.
It is quite obvious that the steroid era in baseball has not ended. Professional baseball players use different forbidden preparations and remain undetectable. But no one can accuse an athlete of doping, basing only on improper drug testing. It is important to focus on facts, accusing an athlete of usage of banned drugs. Otherwise, any suspicion doesn’t have any value.

Melky Cabrera blamed nonexistent dietary supplement for his positive for testosterone

It happens frequently that when sportspeople test positive for any prohibited substances, they try to prove that they have never taken any prohibited medication intentionally. They are looking for different ways to manifest that they are innocent. They do a lot in order to escape from bans and/or other sanctions. Here is a situation.
The professional baseball player Melky Cabrera tested positive for testosterone. Of course, he was sentenced to a ban. Like other athletes he decided to find a way to prove his innocence and prevent the suspension.
A lot of doping sportspersons who are caught say that they have administered a dietary supplement which caused positive for certain forbidden substance. Although several sportspersons may have applied fake dietary supplements, numerous athletes use steroids and choose this way of defense because it works in numerous cases.
So, Melky Cabrera affirmed that he had applied a dietary supplement that resulted in his positive for testosterone. Actually, it was a hoax. Trying to avoid the 50-game suspension, he also created a web site and posted a fictitious product and advertisements that promoted selling it. The product didn’t exist in reality. It was just a hoax of Melky Cabrera and his associates in order to defend the baseball player.
Juan Nunez, a paid consultant for Athletes’ Career Enhanced and Secured Incorporated (ACES), was the person that created the site.
But the hoax turned out to be unsuccessful. The MLB could expose the baseball player and Juan Nunez. Thus, Melky Cabrera was enforced to serve the suspension.
The ACES had also problems. Since Juan Nunez has been a consultant for ACES, the agency and Seth and Sam Levinson were suspected of involving in the hoax. But these persons affirmed that they were not implicated in the creation of the web site and the lie that was invented by Melky Cabrera and Juan Nunez. Juan Nunez also confirmed that Seth and Sam Levinson had not been involved in this defense.
The case is still investigated by the Food and Drug Administration. It is unclear yet whether other persons would be also pursued and punished for the hoax.

Australian newspapers publish false reports about anabolic steroids

Recently Australian Customs and Border Protection detained four persons who possessed the anabolic steroids Oxandrolone (Anavar) and Primoteston Depot (testosterone). Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam tried to smuggle these drugs to Bangladesh. The drugs were confiscated and these individuals were detained.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper reported about this case, confirming that 4 individuals were detained while they desired to traffic steroids that were intended for administration by prostitutes in Bangladesh. This piece of news surprised a lot of individuals. What does The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper mean? Do prostitutes use the same preparations like sportspeople and bodybuilder that try to improve their performance, increasing muscle mass and strength? Why do prostitutes use anabolic steroids? Which is the purpose?
Several individuals realized that it was wrong to write that Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam wanted to smuggle the steroids in order to inject prostitutes with them. Undoubtedly, prostitutes don’t apply anabolic steroids. There is confusion here. Prostitutes take corticosteroids which differ from anabolic steroids wholly. Corticosteroids produce other effects. They are capable to enhance performance in prostitutes. While anabolic steroids enhance muscle size and decrease fat deposits, corticosteroids induce wasting muscles and enhance body fat deposits.
Orexadon is one of catabolic steroids taken by prostitutes. Those who administer this medicine look healthier and more attractive. Thus, such prostitutes who administer this drug have more clients.
A prostitute who administers Orexadon claims that she has ability to serve up to 15 clients daily.
So, it is possible to conclude that prostitutes don’t take anabolic steroids which are usually recommended for performance-enhancing effects in sports and bodybuilding. Corticosteroids are more suitable medicines for them.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper presented a false report. Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam didn’t try to smuggle steroids for prostitutes in Bangladesh.

Steroid users should prepare such drugs, as HCG and Clomid

When you get steroids for cycles, you should also prepare such compounds which must be administered to receive recovery after usage of steroids.
In case a cycle with steroids lasts more than 8 weeks, HCG must be taken during the cycle. It is important to take in consideration that this remedy is administered just during steroid cycles.
There such drugs that should be taken after steroid use. For example, Clomid should be used after steroid cycles. It is necessary to start administering this medication after androgen levels fall substantially and recovery with this remedy becomes possible. It is normally advised to start applying Clomid with a high quantity (300 mg/day) and lower it gradually till 50 mg per day. Then low quantities are used until steroid users become convinced that natural secretion of testosterone is restored and testicles have returned to their usual size.
If Clomid is administered about 6 weeks and no improvement is observed, it is needed to interrupt administration of this remedy. Then if improvements don’t occur, it is recommended to continue taking Clomid till recovery is gotten. It is allowed to use this medicine a year. Several studies have manifested that prolonged usage of this medication doesn’t result in grave problems. However certain persons may experience vision problems because of Clomid, these troubles are not permanent. They disappear after discontinuation of usage. If any negative effects related to vision system appear in those that apply Clomid, they must discontinue taking this medicine.
Clomid may be also administered after steroid cycles. A usual dosage is 75 mg a day in such situations.
Although there are such products which help to get recovery after steroid use and keep strength and muscle gains, it is not recommended to have prolonged steroid cycles.

Clomid and Nolvadex during/after steroid cycles

Numerous persons often ask which compound is more suitable for a PCT: Clomid vs Nolvadex. While certain steroid users think that Clomid is better for this purpose, others believe that Nolvadex is more suitable. Several persons notice that Clomid and Nolvadex should be stacked.
When you evaluate structures of these preparations, you may see that they have similar structures. That’s why they have several similar features. But the most of people and even experts affirm that Clomid and Nolvadex are wholly different preparations. Which basis does this opinion have? These medications are utilized in medicine for various needs. Nolvadex is indicated for treatment of breast cancer in women. As for Clomid, it is applied in case of infertility. That’s why it is affirmed that these are completely various products.
Actually, they may be also applied for various purposes in bodybuilding and sports. Clomid is recommended in order to get recovery after a steroid cycle during a PCT. As for Nolvadex, it is ordinarily used as an anti-estrogen drug.
Comparing potency of these preparations, it is possible to see that Nolvadex is more potent anti-estrogen compound than Clomid.
Both Clomid and Nolvadex have capacity to decrease levels of estrogen, stimulating hypothalamus to produce greater amounts of testosterone.
As for measures of these drugs, they differ because one of them is more powerful than another. Clomid should be administered in higher doses. Thus, such doses of Nolvadex, as 20-40 mg, cause greater benefits than 100-150 mg of Clomid.
Nolvadex is not the most powerful anti-estrogen. Such products, as Proviron, Arimidex and Viratase, are claimed to be more powerful but Nolvadex and Clomid work faster.
Sometimes Clomid or Nolvadex may be administered together with Arimidex or Proviron during a steroid cycle. Such stacks are commonly taken in case of gynecomastia.
When you want to choose which drug you should use: Nolvadex or Clomid, you should take into account several aspects.
Nolvadex influences on cholesterol levels positively. It also has more direct influence on natural production of testosterone than Clomid. As it has been already mentioned, Nolvadex is more potent than Clomid. In addition to these positive features, Nolvadex is safer. Furthermore, Nolvadex causes less dangerous side reactions than Clomid because more decreased measures are required to produce wanted results. Furthermore, while adverse consequences of Clomid are permanent, those of Nolvadex disappear after discontinuation of administration. The only priority of Clomid is following: it helps to maintain more potential gains than Nolvadex.
Knowing these differences between Nolvadex and Clomid, consumers of steroids can make their choice properly.