Explanations of Tom Verducci are controversial

Tom Verducci of Sports Illustrated says about debates connected with rughts of steroid users to be chosen for the Baseball Hall of Fame. But as it generally happens, this explanation displays only confusion of journalists about steroids.
The Baseball Writers Association of America (BWAA) is a professional association of baseball journalists that elect players for the National Baseball Hall of Fame. All journalists that are members of the BWAA already not less than 10 years have opportunity to vote for up to 10 players for the Hall of Fame.
Recently it was a debate between members of the BWAA. They discussed whether admitted or only suspected consumers of steroids and other forbidden medications might entry into Cooperstown.
Members of the BWAA usually have to comment their votes: they must explain why they have voted pro or contra certain questions. Some of them claim that doping destructs the integrity of sports and usage of forbidden drugs is often claimed by them to be immoral.
As for Tom Verducci, he doesn’t believe that administration of steroids is necessarily a moral question. This American sportswriter notes that steroids help consumers to take unfair advantage over those who don’t use controlled substances. According to this writer, performance-enhancing drugs make competitions unfair. Thus, administration of banned medicines induces unfairness in sports. That’s why Tom Verducci denies any connection between doping and morality. He confirms that it is a question that is linked with performance but not to morality. So, Verducci suggests that consumers of steroids should not be allowed to be in the Hall of Fame. But he has voted for the admitted steroid user Jeff Bagwell. This athlete has acknowledged that he had administrated androstenedione. It is necessary to note that this product was not listed among anabolic steroids, when Bagwell took it. According to the Control Act 2004, it is listed among forbidden products. Since it wasn’t legally clamed to be a steroid, Verducci decided to vote for the user of this medication; however, it was always considered to be an anabolic-androgenic steroid by specialists. Moreover, it was said that Bagwell just became bigger but didn’t induce his performance due to usage of androstenedione.
Nevertheless, the decision of Verducci to vote for the admitted user of the steroid is quite controversial. The following question appears: “Maybe Tom Verducci is not against administration of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs by sportspersons?” Since Verducci doesn’t agree that doping is a moral question, he may suppose that enhancement of performance is not a real problem.
A lot of persons suggest that intake of steroids represents evil because they are illegal.